Significant Natural Areas Resource
Management Plan
2002 Draft
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (continued)
|
Executive Summary1. Overview2. Management ApproachValues Strategies 3. Setting4. IPM5. General RecommendationSoils, Erosion, and Public Use 6.Site Specific Recommendations
|
GR-1 GR-2 GR-3 GR-4 GR-5 GR-6 GR-7 GR-8 GR-9 GR-10 GR-11 GR-12 |
|
|
Table ES-1: summary of General Issues and Recommendations (Continued) |
||
|
Topic/Issue |
Recommendations |
|
|
WILDLIFE |
||
|
Birds |
||
|
Issue GR4: Nesting birds (resident species, neotropical migrants, and other species of concern) are sensitive to direct human disturbance and human- generated changes to the environment. These species could be affected by human activities including vegetation management, recreational use, and off- leash dog use if these activities were to occur at the wrong time of year. In addition, brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) are common throughout the City and likely parasitize the nests of most species of songbirds in the area (Murphy 1999). The combination of nest parasitism and disturbance could place significant pressure on native passerine species.
|
Recommendation
GR4a: Conduct annual breeding bird surveys using standardized point
count or transect methodology to develop a list of species nesting, or
suspected of nesting, in Natural Areas. This database of information would
allow for the proper planning and coordination between management
activities, especially tree pruning, to effectively enhance the habitat
used by breeding birds. Recommendation
GR4b: Vegetation management activities (pruning, tree removal, ground
cover removal, etc.) shall not be conducted during the breeding season
(April I -September 1) unless a breeding bird survey has been conducted
first. If active nests are discovered, a 150-foot radius avoidance buffer
shall be centered on the nest site to prevent disturbance of the nesting
birds. Recommendation
GR4c: If continued surveys indicate that parasitism by brown-headed
cowbirds is a significant problem, a cowbird trapping and control program
shall be established in coordination with the resource agencies to
minimize the effects of this species. Recommendation
GR4d: The removal of brush and trees provides material that may be
used to improve habitat for ground-dwelling birds. Brush piles shall be
created from this material whenever they are not offensive visually or a
public safety hazard. Brush piles shall be placed at a maximum of 50 feet
from existing dense cover. Hedgerows created from this material shall be
placed so that they connect scrub habitats and provide movement corridors
for ground-dwelling birds. |
|
|
Issue GR-5. Most of the eucalyptus forests within the system of Natural Areas are mono-cultures of these species. Aside from providing some nesting opportunities for raptors, these forests are of limited value to most bird species. This is, in part, because the understories of these forests are generally sparse and do not support a diverse array of scrub species that provide forage and shelter for ground-dwelling birds.
|
Recommendation
GR-5a.- Promote understory diversity and complexity by installing
native scrub vegetation within the existing forests. Species such as toyon
and elderberry seem most tolerant of conditions in the eucalyptus
understory. Recommendation
GR-5b: Thin these dense forest stands to allow additional light to
reach the forest floor. Small openings cut within the forest could then be
planted with native scrub and tree species to increase overall habitat
complexity and provide important habitat for birds and other wildlife. Recommendation
GR-5c: Outside of the Critical Areas, non-native trees shall be
planted in areas where they will provide wildlife habitat and not pose a
threat to native habitats. Species to consider include, but are not
limited to, Monterey pine (Pinus radiata), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii), and elderberry (Sambucus spp.).
|
|
|
Issue GR-6: Nesting habitat for bird species that require cavities (e.g., wood ducks, woodpeckers, owls, bluebirds, etc.) is often limited within the Natural Areas. Natural cavities are preferred over nest boxes, but both can help support cavity-nesting species.
|
Recommendation
GR-6a: Provide nest boxes for wood ducks at Impound Lake (Lake
Merced), Sharp Park, and Pine Lake. Nest boxes shall be constructed,
monitored, and maintained according to the specifications provided by the
California Waterfowl Association (CWA 1999). It may be possible to get
assistance with this project from the California Wood Duck Program,
sponsored by the CWA. Recommendation
GR-6b: Provide nest boxes for other species such as western bluebirds,
western screech owls, woodpeckers, tree swallows, etc. These shall be
located in habitat appropriate for these species (e.g., bluebird boxes in
the scrub and grasslands, and woodpecker and owl boxes in the forest). The
boxes shall be constructed as designed, installed, monitored, and
maintained as specified. Many box designs are available free of charge
from conservation groups. Control of undesirable species (European
starlings and house sparrows) may also be necessary to make any nest box
program effective. Recommendation
GR-6c: Snags (standing dead trees) shall be left in place unless they
are a hazard to public safety. They provide important breeding habitat for
cavity-nesting birds and perching sites for raptors.
|
|